From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 19xVse-0005nk-00 for ; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 11:09:20 -0700 Received: from mout1.freenet.de ([194.97.50.132]) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 19xVsd-00024R-F1 for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 11:09:19 -0700 Received: from [194.97.50.136] (helo=mx3.freenet.de) by mout1.freenet.de with asmtp (Exim 4.22) id 19xVsa-0007IS-0C for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 20:09:16 +0200 Received: from b2aef.pppool.de ([213.7.42.239] helo=home.petschge.de) by mx3.freenet.de with esmtp (Exim 4.22 #1) id 19xVsY-0001fl-TP for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 20:09:15 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost.petschge.de [127.0.0.1]) by home.petschge.de (Postfix on Linux (i386)) with ESMTP id AFE7B3BCE5 for ; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 20:03:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mars (localhost.petschge.de [127.0.0.1]) by home.petschge.de (Postfix on Linux (i386)) with ESMTP id A96963BCE4 for ; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 20:03:44 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" From: Patrick Kilian Reply-To: petschge@web.de MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20030911180344.A96963BCE4@home.petschge.de> Subject: [uml-devel] Re: 2.6.0 uptime bug Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 19:44:30 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Hi, >> I have a patch which gives the correct uptime. I don't know what the >> patch breaks so please post any problems you have. > Have you been able to figure out whether this is also a problem for > other ports? Your patch suggests that it is, and if it is, then you=20 > should send it to LKML so it can be fixed in mainline. Ok 2.6.0-test5 gives the correct uptime on i386 and the wrong huge uptime a= s uml. My patch doesn't break anything on i386 but I'm going to fix this bu= g in the uml part of the kernel. mfg, Patrick "Petschge" Kilian --=20 Brauchtumspflege ist nicht anmeldepflichtig. Das gilt auch f=FCr=20 zwanzigst=FCndige Martinsumz=FCge im Wendland um einen Castor herum. -- Mathias Schindler in d.o.c ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel