From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 1A4zo7-0006Yv-00 for ; Thu, 02 Oct 2003 02:31:35 -0700 Received: from cimice4.lam.cz ([212.71.168.94] helo=vagabond.light.src) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1A4zo6-00089P-99 for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 02 Oct 2003 02:31:34 -0700 From: Jan Hudec Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Re: pthreads? Message-ID: <20031002093128.GB3512@vagabond> References: <20031002090834.GS24534@vagabond> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 11:31:28 +0200 To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Gerd Knorr , User-mode Linux Kernel Development On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 11:24:11 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Jan Hudec wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 11:07:54 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > BTW, it's libX11 that needs libpthread... > > > > bulb@vagabond:~$ ldd /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6.2 > > libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x400d5000) > > libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x400d8000) > > /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x80000000) > > > > Not see libpthread anywhere around! > > > > However, I just checked gmodule and glib and neither seems to report > > libpthread either! > > ldd instead doesn't show it, but nm does: GEEE, so fend of the LAST argument in that mail, which said: I *RAN* a simple Gtk2.0 application, greped it's /proc//maps for string "pthr" and DIDN'T FIND IT. Which means, that during execution of that applications, libpthread WAS NOT IN MEMORY. If you thing it does not have to be there, well, I also greped strace of the application for the same string an it was not there. And all libraries are actualy _OPEN_ during execution. So neither was it ever READ in memory. Still don't consider that a sufficient proof it is NOT THERE? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jan 'Bulb' Hudec ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel