From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AVASl-0005mU-L0 for User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 13 Dec 2003 06:09:43 -0800 Received: from mout0.freenet.de ([194.97.50.131]) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.24) id 1AVASl-0006rI-9W for User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 13 Dec 2003 06:09:43 -0800 Received: from [194.97.50.136] (helo=mx3.freenet.de) by mout0.freenet.de with asmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1AVASi-0007pv-EG for User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 13 Dec 2003 15:09:40 +0100 Received: from b2904.b.pppool.de ([213.7.41.4] helo=home.petschge.de) by mx3.freenet.de with esmtp (Exim 4.30 #1) id 1AVASN-0007X7-Fc for User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 13 Dec 2003 15:09:40 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by home.petschge.de (Postfix on Linux (i386)) with ESMTP id 966F23BCB8 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 23:11:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from mars (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by home.petschge.de (Postfix on Linux (i386)) with SMTP id 671FF3BCB7 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 23:11:11 +0100 (CET) From: "Patrick \"Petschge\" Kilian" Subject: Re: [uml-devel] linux-2.4.23 References: <200312121917.05059.petschge@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Message-Id: <20031212221111.671FF3BCB7@home.petschge.de> Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 23:11:11 +0100 To: User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Hi, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: >> Is this a know behavourier? Is there a workaround other than to wait for >> uml_patch-2.4.23-uml1? > There is a workaround by making a small change in the source. See the mail > archives about one week back I think. Thanks alot for your and Steves help. Does anybody know why there isn't a official uml_patch-2.4.23-uml1? mfg, Patrick "Petschge" Kilian ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel