From: BlaisorBlade <blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it>
To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] 2.4.22-[67] problems
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 13:48:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200312241348.02720.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031221224001.GO9354@alcor.net>
Alle 23:40, domenica 21 dicembre 2003, Matt Zimmerman ha scritto:
> > > Thanks for looking at it. It's sounding more and more like the new
> > > glibc/linux-kernel-headers packages have broken UML.
> > > Maybe something is
> > > getting the host's kernel headers when it needs the ones from the UML
> > > build tree?
> >
> > Something is getting the host's headers and it must get them, not the
> > ones from UML build tree.
> >
> > Every UML arch file with its name ending in _user.c(+ quite a lot of
> > other ones, listed in USER_OBJS in Makefiles) are built against the host
> > headers, since they are the code interacting with the host.
>
> Yes, I understand that. Was my sentence unclear?
No, just I don't think that situation can happen. Maybe the problem is just
that glibc is built against 2.6(i.e. you should try not only replacing
headers, but also rebuilding glibc after that). Maybe this could be related
with new things from glibc and 2.6, i.e. vsyscall or NPTL(I am just shooting
in the middle, I don't even have ideas of what vsyscall is).
I've tried even if any of the header-generator programs use some changed
headers, but for I saw is that every definition stayed the same
(except
#define PTRACE_OLDSETOPTIONS 21
which had same number but was named PTRACE_SETOPTIONS in 2.4).
> I was suggesting that
> it was possible that the host's kernel headers were being used in a
> situation where the UML tree kernel headers _should_ be used.
I understood this; only I think this doesn't happen...
--
cat <<EOSIGN
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux Kernel 2.4.21/2.6.0-test on an i686; Linux registered user n. 292729
EOSIGN
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-24 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-20 1:13 [uml-devel] 2.4.22-[67] problems Matt Zimmerman
2003-12-20 17:14 ` Jeff Dike
2003-12-21 0:47 ` Matt Zimmerman
2003-12-21 15:58 ` BlaisorBlade
2003-12-21 22:40 ` Matt Zimmerman
2003-12-21 23:16 ` Matt Zimmerman
2003-12-22 0:25 ` Jeff Dike
2003-12-22 4:08 ` Matt Zimmerman
2003-12-22 5:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-12-22 9:08 ` Matt Zimmerman
2004-01-05 17:51 ` Adam Heath
2004-01-05 18:10 ` Matt Zimmerman
2003-12-24 12:48 ` BlaisorBlade [this message]
2003-12-21 0:52 ` Matt Zimmerman
2003-12-21 1:06 ` Matt Zimmerman
2003-12-28 9:33 ` Matt Zimmerman
2003-12-28 9:51 ` Matt Zimmerman
2003-12-28 9:52 ` Matt Zimmerman
2004-01-06 2:59 ` Jeff Dike
2003-12-28 10:12 ` Matt Zimmerman
2003-12-28 11:30 ` Matt Zimmerman
2003-12-30 18:43 ` Resolution (Re: [uml-devel] 2.4.22-[67] problems) Matt Zimmerman
2004-01-06 2:58 ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-06 7:41 ` Nuno Silva
2004-01-06 8:02 ` Matt Zimmerman
2004-01-06 8:20 ` Nuno Silva
2004-01-06 8:47 ` Nuno Silva
2004-01-06 9:20 ` Nuno Silva
2004-01-06 17:13 ` Matt Zimmerman
2004-01-09 7:22 ` Nuno Silva
2004-01-08 7:07 ` Matt Zimmerman
2004-01-12 18:36 ` [uml-devel] Panic with slirp transport and gcc 3.3 Matt Zimmerman
2004-01-13 15:25 ` [uml-devel] " Bill Allombert
2004-01-13 17:30 ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-13 17:44 ` Bill Allombert
2004-01-13 18:51 ` Matt Zimmerman
2004-01-16 2:38 ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-16 2:38 ` Matt Zimmerman
2004-01-16 20:04 ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-16 19:49 ` Matt Zimmerman
2004-01-17 0:42 ` Matt Zimmerman
2003-12-21 1:29 ` [uml-devel] 2.4.22-[67] problems Matt Zimmerman
2003-12-20 19:05 ` Nick Craig-Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200312241348.02720.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it \
--to=blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox