From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AaKHT-00026O-A0 for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 27 Dec 2003 11:39:23 -0800 Received: from smtp005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.11.36]) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AaK6S-0004XI-I1 for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 27 Dec 2003 11:28:00 -0800 From: BlaisorBlade Subject: Re: [uml-devel] UML patches against vanilla 2.6.0 References: <200312261905.48277.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it> In-Reply-To: <200312261905.48277.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200312271927.26870.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it> Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 19:27:26 +0100 To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net I have some doubts about the 2.6 host-skas patch. I've searched through the list for earlier ports to 2.6 and I've seen someone (Bryan O'Sullivan ) complaining: "The big issue with the skas patches, though, appears to be that they don't handle the UML kernel being killed, which results in the host kernel's memory management being completely trashed." Is this a real issue or not? -- cat <