From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AaJOL-0000xM-2F for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 27 Dec 2003 10:42:25 -0800 Received: from smtp005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.11.36]) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AaJFx-0006cW-Sf for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 27 Dec 2003 10:33:46 -0800 From: BlaisorBlade Subject: Re: [uml-devel] UML build system: patch ready References: <200312241943.37474.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it> <1072468270.6872.13.camel@laptop-linux> In-Reply-To: <1072468270.6872.13.camel@laptop-linux> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200312271933.17194.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it> Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 19:33:17 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Alle 20:51, venerd=EC 26 dicembre 2003, Nigel Cunningham ha scritto: > On Fri, 2003-12-26 at 21:12, Jeff Chua wrote: > > arch/um/sys-i386/bugs.c ... > > //line 110 > > struct modify_ldt_ldt_s ldt; > > > > //line 117 > > err =3D modify_ldt(1, &ldt, sizeof(ldt)); > > > > > > It looks that modify_ldt_ldt_s is not defined anywhere There is only one definition in the asm/ldt.h header: only the struct name = has=20 changed between 2.4 and 2.6. This is the only problem. Rename that struct a= nd=20 you're done. > > and modify_ldt() > > cannot be found. That is only a warning: in fact this function's prototype has never had a=20 declaration in system headers. > If you can get this sorted out (and tell me how), I may be able to get > software suspend [a bit closer to] working under UML. The lack of > support for modifying ldts was where I blocked when I briefly looked at > it a while ago. --=20 cat <