From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AcU4Q-00036H-86 for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 02 Jan 2004 10:30:50 -0800 Received: from smtp001.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.11.32]) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 4.30) id 1AcU4P-0000aG-Mx for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 02 Jan 2004 10:30:49 -0800 From: BlaisorBlade Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [UML combo patch] uml-combo-2.6.0-A7 References: <20040101191630.GA23954@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20040101191630.GA23954@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401021929.54997.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it> Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 19:29:54 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Alle 20:16, gioved=EC 1 gennaio 2004, Ingo Molnar ha scritto: > here's a new combo all-in-one UML patch against the vanilla 2.6.0 > kernel: > > redhat.com/~mingo/UML-patches/uml-combo-2.6.0-A7 > > i've merged the various fixes collected by Paolo, Thanks for paying attention to my changes. > plus fixed a bug in > the __do_mmap_pgoff() change that caused host kernel bootup hangs. Yes, I did experience problems with my guest kernel (and today I tracked it= =20 down to the E* patches), but I didn't know what it is... Aargh! A missing=20 return! Ok, I'm too foolish. Thanks for finding it! (But why the hell GCC=20 3.2.2 doesn't warn about it?) Two questions: 1) I've added the G-03(this fixes the empty /proc/kallsyms issue), H-03 and= =20 H-04(for Makefiles cleanups) patches. Would you try them? 2)Have you given a look to the mm/memory.c change (what I'd split into A-04= )?=20 Do you think that change can be safe even for the host kernel? --=20 cat <