From: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Gerd Knorr <kraxel@bytesex.org>,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Re: uml-patch-2.6.0
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 18:57:30 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040118235730.GC21046@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040118162112.GA15509@elte.hu>
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 05:21:12PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> hm, are you sure this is the reason why they dont boot? At least the
> ones in Fedora fall back to LinuxThreads if set_thread_area is -ENOSYS.
> Old 2.4 kernels work just fine - UML ought to work fine too.
No, I'm not. But I am seeing -ENOSYS from one of [gs]et_thread_area right
before things go haywire. But I haven't looked at it closely enough to
see if that's the real problem.
2.4 UMLs work fine with these libcs. I had been assuming (without any
evidence) that there was some other capability check (like uname), and
libc gets horribly confused when it sees a 2.6 kernel that doesn't have
the thread_info stuff.
If the compatibility check is -ENOSYS from one of those syscalls, then
this theory goes right out the window, and something else is wrong in UML.
Jeff
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-18 23:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-13 5:05 [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.0 Jeff Dike
2004-01-13 5:18 ` [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.0 Jeff Dike
2004-01-13 10:19 ` Sven Köhler
2004-01-13 18:55 ` Gerd Knorr
2004-01-16 2:33 ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-16 10:03 ` M A Young
2004-01-16 11:42 ` Gerd Knorr
2004-01-17 16:10 ` BlaisorBlade
2004-01-16 17:27 ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-16 21:56 ` Gerd Knorr
2004-01-17 21:12 ` M A Young
2004-01-18 4:47 ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-16 23:47 ` Sven Köhler
2004-01-17 19:09 ` BlaisorBlade
2004-01-17 19:50 ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-17 20:03 ` BlaisorBlade
2004-01-18 4:51 ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-18 16:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-01-18 21:06 ` [uml-devel] uml 2.6.1 kbuild simplifications Ingo Molnar
2004-01-19 0:08 ` [uml-devel] " Jeff Dike
2004-01-19 7:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-01-20 17:40 ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-18 23:57 ` Jeff Dike [this message]
2004-01-19 7:53 ` [uml-devel] Re: uml-patch-2.6.0 Ingo Molnar
2004-01-19 8:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-01-20 0:19 ` M A Young
2004-01-20 0:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-01-20 0:41 ` M A Young
2004-01-23 21:52 ` [uml-devel] tt mode tls/glibc crash with 2.6 (Was: Re: uml-patch-2.6.0) M A Young
2004-01-23 23:52 ` [uml-devel] " M A Young
2004-01-24 12:25 ` M A Young
2004-01-24 18:20 ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-24 19:31 ` M A Young
2004-01-28 11:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-05 12:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-05 12:45 ` M A Young
2004-02-05 13:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-05 13:28 ` M A Young
2004-02-05 18:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-05 19:15 ` M A Young
2004-02-05 19:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-05 19:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-05 19:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-06 7:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-01-20 1:27 ` [uml-devel] Re: uml-patch-2.6.0 Jeff Dike
2004-01-20 17:22 ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-20 19:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-01-17 19:09 ` [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.0 BlaisorBlade
2004-01-17 19:51 ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-18 13:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-01-18 13:58 ` [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.1-1: VFS: Cannot open root device "ubd0" or unknown-block(0, 0) Ingo Molnar
2004-01-18 14:04 ` [uml-devel] " Ingo Molnar
2004-01-18 23:48 ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-17 20:32 ` [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.0 M A Young
2004-01-19 17:06 ` [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.0 Gerd Knorr
2004-01-20 19:42 ` BlaisorBlade
2004-01-20 21:30 ` Gerd Knorr
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-01-18 18:46 M A Young
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040118235730.GC21046@ccure.user-mode-linux.org \
--to=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=kraxel@bytesex.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox