From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1AizWE-0000IG-M7 for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 09:18:26 -0800 Received: from [12.177.129.25] (helo=ccure.user-mode-linux.org) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.30) id 1AizWE-0005mq-5G for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 09:18:26 -0800 Message-Id: <200401201740.i0KHeWDG003215@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 19 Jan 2004 08:34:05 +0100." <20040119073405.GA3175@elte.hu> References: <200401130505.i0D55XS4026774@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <87y8sbbrup.fsf@bytesex.org> <200401160233.i0G2Xcrf004288@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <20040118162112.GA15509@elte.hu> <20040118210605.GA23259@elte.hu> <20040119000802.GF21046@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <20040119073405.GA3175@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Jeff Dike Subject: [uml-devel] Re: uml 2.6.1 kbuild simplifications Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 12:40:32 -0500 To: Ingo Molnar Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net mingo@elte.hu said: > The dual compilation space ('user code' and 'kernel code' compilation) > within UML is not yet fully expressable via kbuild. In my opinion, it doesn't need to be. BlaisorBlade and I have been having an argument about it. He thinks kbuild should support it. I consider it to be an artifact of UML containing intermingled OS-dependent and OS-independent code. With the OS-dependent code separated out into arch/um/os, the rest of UML becomes nice, normal kernel code. The stuff under arch/um/os is then pure userspace code, and I have no problem with sticking some special CFLAGS mangler in the Makefile (or Makefiles) there. Then, the code, and the special make magic that it needs are all in one place, and we don't need to fiddle kbuild. Jeff ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel