From: BlaisorBlade <blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it>
To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Re: [uml-user] UML (unofficial) patches against vanilla 2.6.2
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2004 17:45:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200402071745.52294.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0402051653550.6551@linux-sxs.org>
> > If someone can point me to some free web-hosting without those bad ads
> > going into, I'd be very glad to use it.
>
> sf.net ?
I've actually released files with sf.net. And if I had to do this again, I
would upload patches once every 2 years. You cannot even imagine how much it
sucks. And how much it sucks if you upload ten files at a time. You need for
every file to do at least a 4 step web-procedure (and without ADSL there is
an high latency). Plus it sucks for who downloads, for the screen where you
must choose the mirror.
Obviously I'm not angry with you - it's not your fault. Just flaming sf.net
usability.
--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux registered user n. 292729
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-07 16:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-05 20:07 [uml-devel] UML (unofficial) patches against vanilla 2.6.2 BlaisorBlade
2004-02-05 21:54 ` [uml-devel] Re: [uml-user] " Net Llama!
2004-02-07 16:45 ` BlaisorBlade [this message]
2004-02-05 23:01 ` Jeff Dike
2004-02-13 5:23 ` Jeff Dike
2004-02-13 7:15 ` modify_ldt_ldt_s vs. user_desc (Re: [uml-devel] Re: [uml-user] UML (unofficial) patches against vanilla 2.6.2) Matt Zimmerman
2004-02-13 13:59 ` J. Bruce Fields
2004-02-14 14:14 ` BlaisorBlade
2004-02-14 14:45 ` [uml-devel] Re: [uml-user] UML (unofficial) patches against vanilla 2.6.2 BlaisorBlade
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200402071745.52294.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it \
--to=blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox