From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: modify_ldt_ldt_s vs. user_desc (Re: [uml-devel] Re: [uml-user] UML (unofficial) patches against vanilla 2.6.2) Message-ID: <20040213135929.GA27460@fieldses.org> References: <200402052107.37625.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it> <200402130523.i1D5NTgR005420@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <20040213071536.GJ19147@alcor.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040213071536.GJ19147@alcor.net> From: "J. Bruce Fields" Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 08:59:30 -0500 To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 11:15:36PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > I don't suppose there would be much harm in adding a macro to ldt.h so that > existing software could continue to work, but that change belongs in the > kernel. The policy as I understand it has always been that userland needs its own headers, and that kernel headers are not meant to be usable by applications unmodified. Looks like a debian bug to me.... --Bruce Fields ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel