From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-Id: <200403040305.i2435EWo009397@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 04 Mar 2004 00:11:32 +0100." <0d2e01c40174$dfda5b40$2000000a@schlepptopp> References: <40430B47.3000004@sms.ed.ac.uk> <200403022005.42635.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it> <0d2e01c40174$dfda5b40$2000000a@schlepptopp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Jeff Dike Subject: [uml-devel] Re: Hang at ipv4 setup is a cpufreq issue! Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 22:05:14 -0500 To: roland Cc: BlaisorBlade , user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, uml-user for_spam@gmx.de said: > i did an "modprobe p4-clockmod" and then "echo 0%40%50%performance >/ > proc/cpufreq" to reduce the speed of my 2.6 ghz p4 (40% minimum, 50% > maximum) > and........ > THE UML STARTS FINE AND THE HANG AT IPV4 SETUP IS GONE! > so - this is the workaround. > now we need a patch ;) > do we need the so called "rtc fix" ? does it exist already for 2.6 > kernel ? 2.4 and 2.6 are identical as far as the rtc stuff goes. So, there's something else wrong. I'm wondering whether this is somehow related to the rdtsc problem that came up recently. Jeff ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel