From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B1xdK-0005kA-ND for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 17:08:10 -0800 Received: from postman4.arcor-online.net ([151.189.0.154] helo=postman.arcor.de) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.30) id 1B1xdJ-0000qE-Ax for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 17:08:09 -0800 Received: from server.schwinge.homeip.net (dialin-212-144-135-153.arcor-ip.net [212.144.135.153]) (authenticated bits=0) by postman.arcor.de (8.13.0.PreAlpha4/8.13.0.PreAlpha4) with ESMTP id i2D183D1015805 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 02:08:04 +0100 (MET) From: Thomas Schwinge Subject: Re: [uml-devel] UML crashing-the known scheduler bug Message-ID: <20040313010000.GA13419@speedy.schwinge.homeip.net> References: <20040311185105.GA22820@speedy.schwinge.homeip.net> <200403112056.08200.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200403112056.08200.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it> Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 02:00:00 +0100 To: BlaisorBlade Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 08:55:46PM +0100, BlaisorBlade wrote: > I've given a look to the problem and I think that it has already been > discussed and that fixes were posted and included in next UML patch (not yet > released). OK. Using linux-2.6.4 with uml-patch-2.6.4-1 solved this problem. I should have waited just one day... :-) > Also, UML for now does not work well in SMP mode (and it does not actually > parallelize the work): the spinlock messages at the beginning suggest you are > using it. I'm not using SMP mode, but these messages also disappeared with 2.6.4. > If you have a SMP host, use for the host the SKAS patch found at: > > http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade > > since it has a critical fix for SMP mode. Are there any other differences between your SKAS mode patch and ? Regards, Thomas ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel