From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B8kVS-0007pt-Rg for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 10:32:06 -0800 Received: from smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.11.35]) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B8kVS-00017W-B6 for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 10:32:06 -0800 From: BlaisorBlade Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Re: Vmlinux - linux linking stages & /proc/kallsyms empty References: <200403302025.02276.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it> <200403302138.i2ULc3Ll004220@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> In-Reply-To: <200403302138.i2ULc3Ll004220@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200403312042.39776.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it> Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 19:42:39 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Jeff Dike Alle 23:38, marted=EC 30 marzo 2004, Jeff Dike ha scritto: > blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it said: > > This because the vmlinux link script is wrong (you rejected the patch > > I sent you time ago, was in the patchset). But kallsyms must contain > > the true addresses of the kernel symbols; since they change between > > vmlinux and linux (if they didn't change, the second step would be > > useless), they cannot be correct. I think that even System.map > > symbols do not match. > > I didn't reject it so much as I put it aside for the moment because I > didn't understand it. > > Your explanations, then and now, make sense, so I'm going to have another > look at it for my next 2.6 patch. Wait a moment (maybe you already understood this but I'm not sure): what I = suggest *now* is much *more* than the patch I had at that time - that one w= as=20 not enough (i.e. with that you get /proc/kallsyms full, but having wrong=20 addresses)! --=20 Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade Linux registered user n. 292729 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id638&op=CCk _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel