From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BJdEq-0001JL-NY for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 11:59:56 -0700 Received: from smtp003.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.11.34]) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BJdEq-0007QR-4C for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 11:59:56 -0700 From: BlaisorBlade Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Still can't get an 2.6.6-rcX UML References: <20040430183116.24011.qmail@praize.com> In-Reply-To: <20040430183116.24011.qmail@praize.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200404302058.21912.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it> Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 20:58:21 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Alle 20:31, venerd=EC 30 aprile 2004, gboutwel ha scritto: > Blaisorblade wrote: > > The problem is that: > > > > a) I think that file should include the "kernelspace" headers... > > > > however the kludges needed to do it are very fragile when Kbuild > > changes a > > > bit (this problem has repeatedly showed up against Linux 2.6). > > Ok. If it where including kernelspace headers I don't think > this would be a problem. Yes, what I mean is that the proper fix is probably to make it use the kern= el=20 headers as it did before. Would you post the output of the failing make=20 command with the V=3D1 option added, to see the actual build command? > As I understand it SID installs as it's 'de facto' headers not > 2.6, but 2.5.999-test7. See: > http://packages.debian.org/unstable/devel/linux-kernel-headers > And it would seem that this area (in kernel headers) has recently > changed (when compared to 2.5) or up to this point UML builds > have been going against kernel provided headers instead of the > 2.5 headers debian's shipping. I think the 2nd thing holds, and that my suggestions is a workaround that=20 should work (I hope)... Bye --=20 Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade Linux registered user n. 292729 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.=20 Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.=20 http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id149&alloc_id=8166&op=CCk _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel