From: BlaisorBlade <blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it>
To: David T Hollis <dhollis@davehollis.com>, gboutwel <gboutwel@praize.com>
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] uml-2.6.8-rc2 (2.6.8-rc2 w/ uml-patch-2.6.7-01)
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:05:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200407261705.23006.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1090640326.4233.4.camel@dhollis-lnx.kpmg.com>
Alle 05:38, sabato 24 luglio 2004, David T Hollis ha scritto:
> On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 21:43 +0000, gboutwel wrote:
> >
> > Probably something simple, but I wanted to discuss with folks
> > more in the now on if the above (stdio_console) fix was the right
> > one, and to find out if anyone else has an idea of how to fixe
> > the find_next_zero_bit error.
Yes, I saw that error in -mm and I agree that renaming is right; about the
other one, the reported fix (below) is correct; also, it would be nice to
delete include/asm-um/bitops.h (which includes the i386 version of the
include; since those funcs were moved to out-of-line ones, the trick must be
done that way).
Note however that we must not hardcode that we steel things from i386 arch,
but we must use $(SUBARCH) - or it will break for any other archs (the only
working one, at the moment, is the x86_64 one).
> I ran into this around a week or so ago as well. Unfortunately, I don't
> have a patch but here is the rough idea of what I did to work around it.
> find_next_zero_bit is defined in arch/i386/lib/bitops.c. If you look in
> arch/um/sys-i386, a couple files get symlinked from other parts of the
> tree (see the Makefile). If you add bitops.c to this, you will get past
> the find_next_zero_bit problem. You would add bitops.o to the obj-y,
> bitops.c to SYMLINKS, bitops.c-dir := arch/i386/lib. I think thats
> about it.
--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux registered user n. 292729
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-26 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-23 21:43 [uml-devel] uml-2.6.8-rc2 (2.6.8-rc2 w/ uml-patch-2.6.7-01) gboutwel
2004-07-24 3:38 ` David T Hollis
2004-07-26 15:05 ` BlaisorBlade [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-07-27 22:08 gboutwel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200407261705.23006.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it \
--to=blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it \
--cc=dhollis@davehollis.com \
--cc=gboutwel@praize.com \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox