From: BlaisorBlade <blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it>
To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>,
akpm@osdl.org, jdike@addtoit.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Re: [patch 1/3] uml-ubd-no-empty-queue
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 20:50:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200409072050.25814.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040907093559.GL6323@suse.de>
On Tuesday 07 September 2004 11:35, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 06 2004, blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it wrote:
> Patch is correct.
Ok, thanks. Do you see anything else that needs fixing? The code the patch
below removes has hidden this bug, so there could be other serious bugs (and
by serious I mean Oopses or data loss).
Known issues:
- need to port to BIOs (a bit hard because I need first to understand the
request mangling - see cowify_req. The code idea is to redirect each sector
independently either to the UBD backing file or to the COW file. COW stand
for Copy On Write: it allows to have the UBD read only and a COW file
containing just the changes).
- Uml SMP support does not compile from sometimes so spinlocking is broken in
ubd_finish (only in some cases - when called by do_ubd_request and thread_fd
== -1). To see this, add ubd=sync on command line and turn spinlock debugging
on.
--- uml-linux-2.6.8.1/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c~uml-ubd-any-elevator
2004-08-29 14:40:53.731043416 +0200
+++ uml-linux-2.6.8.1-paolo/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c 2004-08-29
14:40:53.733043112 +0200
@@ -749,8 +749,6 @@ int ubd_init(void)
return -1;
}
- elevator_init(ubd_queue, &elevator_noop);
-
if (fake_major != MAJOR_NR) {
char name[sizeof("ubd_nnn\0")];
--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux registered user n. 292729
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-07 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-06 17:44 [uml-devel] [patch 1/3] uml-ubd-no-empty-queue blaisorblade_spam
2004-09-06 21:26 ` [uml-devel] " Andrew Morton
2004-09-07 2:26 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-09-07 18:04 ` BlaisorBlade
2004-09-07 21:23 ` Andrew Morton
2004-09-07 9:35 ` Jens Axboe
2004-09-07 18:50 ` BlaisorBlade [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200409072050.25814.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it \
--to=blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox