From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1C5Uj8-0002qi-4z for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 09 Sep 2004 12:37:02 -0700 Received: from smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.11.35]) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C5Uj7-0006Un-Ft for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 09 Sep 2004 12:37:02 -0700 From: BlaisorBlade References: <7153203.1094632577758.SLOX.WebMail.wwwrun@webmail.helinet.de> <200409092024.17925.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it> <20040909184951.GM5330@alcor.net> In-Reply-To: <20040909184951.GM5330@alcor.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200409092133.35518.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it> Subject: [uml-devel] Re: [uml-user] UML hanging at "Activating swap" Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 21:33:35 +0200 To: Matt Zimmerman Cc: user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net, Dennis Ploeger , Michael West , user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Thursday 09 September 2004 20:49, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 08:24:17PM +0200, BlaisorBlade wrote: > > On Thursday 09 September 2004 15:48, Dennis Ploeger wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > Just for your info: Done it. > > > > > > I've tried to deactivate swapping (and found out, where I can do that), > > > but that wasn't the point after all. It was hwclock (which was > > > activated _after_ activating the swap, but didn't show any output). > > > After deactivating that, it worked. > > > > Thanks a lot, that makes a lot of sense. However, since you say you use > > Debian 3.1, probably Matt Zimmerman (Debian UML maintainer) should take a > > look at this. > > Yes, I ran into this problem when testing the 2.4.24-3um packages for > Debian. With previous UMLs, hwclock would simply produce an error, and the > process would continue, but with 2.4.24-3um, it seems to hang. Any idea > why this might be? Not at all - there is a big bug in 2.4.24-3 with modules (any iptables user get crashes), and "rtc" is probably a module; that bug is fixed in 2.4.26-2, which has another critical bug on console I/O fixed in 2.4.26-3, which is safe (apart all the experimental work on humfs and hostfs, which make them break in multiple ways). By the way, I've not heard this with any other distro (on my own I've only a Slack 9.0 root fs), so a look to hwclock could be useful, maybe. Also, check for Real Time Clock UML option (enabling/disabling - does it makes difference?). Here you can find a splitout version of all the changes from 2.4.24-1, so that you can try multiple combination of them. On the page there is the link to patch-scripts, which you'll love for patch-kit management (they are the tools used for the -mm tree). Give also a read to "series" and "rawSeries", inside the patch-scripts folder. The patch at fault for modules is "optimization-unstable.patch", which is reverted in "revert-optim-broken.patch". http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade/patches/UML-splitout-2.4.26-2.tar.bz2 Bye -- Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade Linux registered user n. 292729 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel