From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1CHB6B-0002j3-OU for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 18:05:07 -0700 Received: from smtp001.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.11.32]) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CHB6A-0006kw-IU for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 18:05:07 -0700 From: BlaisorBlade MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200410120305.24675.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it> Subject: [uml-devel] [patch 0/17] UML updates, which must be merged before 2.6.9 Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 03:05:24 +0200 To: akpm@osdl.org Cc: jdike@addtoit.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Andrew, sorry for sending these patches so late, but they are (mostly one-liners) needed to fix either warnings in compilation (the patches are safe) or probable bugs which are created by these warnings. The Makefile patch are of another kind: actually, when I send that couple of patches merged before -rc3, they were against my tree and absolutely incorrect against Linus tree; sorry for not checking that; in fact UML does not link with neither -rc3 nor -rc4 (also due to a compilation bug I already fixed for -rc3). However, this Makefile fixes fix everything, have been longly tested in public (hanging both in my tree, in SuSE UML tree and in Jeff Dike's tree). Finally, I'm sending a patch for a network corruption which is very nasty; it's a one-liner, a resync against the copied original code and I've actually tested it works perfectly. So, please, even if now we are in a hurry after -rc4, merge them. It's the only possibility for UML to actually work "out of the box". Oh well, and sorry for sending "[uml-devel] [patch 4/6] uml: don't declare cpu_online - fix compilation error" - I just noticed it's included in 2.6.9-rc4-mm1. All the rest applies without even any offsets to that tree, too. Thanks a lot for your help. -- Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade Linux registered user n. 292729 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel