From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1CJfBG-0001qJ-SH for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:36:38 -0700 Received: from smtp002.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.11.33]) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CJfBG-0007gd-3B for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:36:38 -0700 From: BlaisorBlade Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Re: [uml-user] UML on PPC? state of the art References: <415408E40001A675@ms001msg.mail.fw> <200410181948.22460.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200410182336.58625.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it> Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 23:36:58 +0200 To: Adam Heath Cc: user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net, stefano.melchior@fastwebnet.it, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Monday 18 October 2004 22:55, Adam Heath wrote: > On Mon, 18 Oct 2004, BlaisorBlade wrote: > > On Monday 18 October 2004 17:58, SteX wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > does anyone know if the porting of UML on PPC has still been staled? or > > > anyone has started working on? > > > My Apple Powerbook is crying! ((:-(( > > > > > > I found something about the porting on Chris Emerson's home page, but > > > it is staled sice july 2001! > > > > Where's that page? > > > > > Let me know. > > > > > > Thank you in advance > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > SteX > > > > Nobody is working on the PPC port. If someone wants to start helping, we > > will welcome him. Currently, the interest in UML is increasing, new > > developers come in, and after a lot of time, a new architecture (x86_64) > > is being supported. Also we've seen messages from people starting work to > > port UML even to ARM machines(!). No actual code, yet, so I suppose they > > stopped. > > > > However, nobody removed the old code from UML. It has even been accepted > > in the 2.6 kernel, even if it is completely broken. > > Side question: does the !i386 uml options depend on BROKEN in kconfig? No - but actually I do not think there is a such "Kconfig option". You should add SUBARCH=ppc on the command line to cross-build it. A good idea could be "echo WARNING - code currrently broken". However it's quite impossible for it to build at all. Bye -- Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade Linux registered user n. 292729 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel