From: Cameron Patrick <cameron@patrick.wattle.id.au>
To: roland <for_spam@gmx.de>
Cc: user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] UML "Distro" ?
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:59:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041021065935.GB4900@patrick.wattle.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <053e01c4b6f4$93f48e90$2000000a@schlepptopp>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1316 bytes --]
roland wrote:
> I would like to hear your opinion if it`s worth thinking about a
> "UML Linux Distribution".
Sounds like an eminently sensible idea to me :-)
> It could be based on another distro (debian? fedora?) and contain:
My personal bias would be to base it on Debian, as it is generally
quite readily hackable, and has a lot of the infrastructure to support
UML already there. Dunno, I don't think it really matters that much.
> - A setup for installation of a minimalistic, UML-"ready" base
> system - call it a "UML runtime environment". That means: Recent and
> skas/sysemu-patched kernel(2.6), modules, X, uml-utilities, screen,
> scripts, bridge-utils......
Is having X installed really desirable most of the time? Most of the
uses for this distro would be on servers, and having X on the host
makes maintaining the distro harder for relatively little benefit.
> - Pre-configured environment (bridge setup,tmpfs,mountpoints...)
Scripts to make it easy to add and remove UML guest instances would
also be quite useful -- especially if it could take care of having
UMLs running as their own user id (for security reasons) and setting
up a root filesystem.
> - basic root-filesystems "ready to run"
Or alternatively, including tools like rootstrap to make generating
root fs'es easy?
Cameron.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-21 6:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-20 22:31 [uml-devel] UML "Distro" ? roland
2004-10-21 6:59 ` Cameron Patrick [this message]
2004-10-21 10:30 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2004-10-21 14:56 ` Michael Richardson
2004-10-21 7:19 ` [uml-devel] Re: [uml-user] " NTEK Technologies
2004-10-21 9:36 ` Gerd Knorr
2004-10-21 12:52 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-10-21 15:14 ` kaz
2004-10-22 4:16 ` Jeff Dike
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041021065935.GB4900@patrick.wattle.id.au \
--to=cameron@patrick.wattle.id.au \
--cc=for_spam@gmx.de \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox