From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1CKqi5-00033i-1Q for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 21:07:25 -0700 Received: from [12.177.129.25] (helo=ccure.user-mode-linux.org) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.41) id 1CKqi3-0002wb-KB for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 21:07:24 -0700 Message-Id: <200410220516.i9M5GwFL007932@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Jeff Dike Subject: [uml-devel] What to send to Andrew next Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 01:16:58 -0400 To: BlaisorBlade Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net We've pretty much got -mm and -linus caught up with the updates that had been sitting around. At this point, my patch list is a mix of things that both are and aren't ready for prime time. So, I'd like opinions on what's ready. The names below are the ones at http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/patches.html Here's my take on it: Ready - catch_eintr_generic_console_write fix-some-warnings - some things left over from your patch need-bash - I changed the comment :-) syscall-returns - the start of the x86_64 stuff, this one cleans up int -> long declarations in the system calls type-sizes - ditto for some other types syscalls - factors the system calls between generic and arch-specific a bit better, I consider this safe because you can look at sys_call_table before and after and see that they're the same tmp-exec defconfig smp-link fix-ptrace-interfaces - straightforward interface fixes no-chans - makes sure something hits the screen when someone makes a bogus config no-timestamp comments Uncertain - use-va_end - looks good to me, but have you figured out why it causes crashes? export-Symbols - I need to look at that phys_t change, which doesn't belong there Single_Linking_Step - leftovers, build linux, add archhelp, you sent something like this to Andrew, so this may be essentially already there do_signal and the rest of Bodo's fixes - I want his test cases before I send these anywhere, although the ones that make UML look like the other arches might be OK. Dangerous - 3-level-pagetables and the rest of the x86_64 stuff Jeff ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel