From: Blaisorblade <blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it>
To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: "Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE" <util@deuroconsult.ro>,
jdike@karaya.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [uml-devel] Re: [uml-user] [PATCH] extend the limits for command line
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 15:34:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200411041534.31568.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0411040859130.18123@webhosting.rdsbv.ro>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1956 bytes --]
On Thursday 04 November 2004 08:08, Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE wrote:
> Hello!
>
> (I resend this because I get no feedback.)
Sorry, miss of time.
> Testing UML on my project, I hit the limit for command line with something
> like this:
> default \
> mem=64M \
> ubda=COW,/data/UML4/roots/ROOT1 \
> ubdb=SWAP \
> ubdc=CONF.tar \
> ${HSSTR} \
> eth0=daemon,fe:fd:39:bd:cc:d7,,/data/UML4/conf/example1/socks/SW1
> eth1=daemon,fe:fd:01:01:01:12,,/data/UML4/conf/example1/socks/SW2
> eth2=daemon,fe:fd:01:01:01:99,,/data/UML4/conf/example1/socks/SW4
> eth3=daemon,fe:fd:01:01:01:03,,/data/UML4/conf/example1/socks/SW5
> eth4=daemon,fe:fd:01:01:01:04,,/data/UML4/conf/example1/socks/SW6
> eth5=daemon,fe:fd:01:01:01:81,,/data/UML4/conf/example1/socks/SW8p1
> eth6=daemon,fe:fd:3f:a9:35:e2,,/data/UML4/conf/EXTERN/E1 \
> con=null \
> ssl0=port:9101 \
> umid=example1-pc1 \
> @pc1@
> Patch to extend the limits (buffer and number of args/envs) is attached.
> Please consider including it because UML is intended to be run with such
> long lines.
> I'm open to other alternatives as a Kconfig entry for this.
> Thank you!
> Signed-off-by: Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE <catab at umbrella dot ro>
The idea of the patch is correct.
The UML part should be mergeable immediately - however, I don't know if that
could be a security risk or has any bug (any place still using the old size).
Also, I'd like to understand what arch/um/kernel/user_util.c wants to do near
its beginning!
For the arch-independent code, there needs to be something like a Kconfig
entry (not necessarily a user-question, see CONFIG_GENERIC_RWSEM for
instance).
Also, I'd like to cross-check this patch with the one used by Knoppix for ages
to do the same thing.
Bye
--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux registered user n. 292729
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-04 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.61.0411040859130.18123@webhosting.rdsbv.ro>
2004-11-04 14:34 ` Blaisorblade [this message]
2005-03-02 19:58 ` [uml-devel] Re: [uml-user] [PATCH] extend the limits for command line Blaisorblade
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200411041534.31568.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it \
--to=blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it \
--cc=jdike@karaya.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=util@deuroconsult.ro \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox