From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1CWMv1-00074T-QD for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:44:23 -0800 Received: from smtp002.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.11.33]) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CWMuz-0005Xd-IS for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:44:23 -0800 From: Blaisorblade References: <000901c4d0e1$e7f998d0$0201a8c0@hawk> In-Reply-To: <000901c4d0e1$e7f998d0$0201a8c0@hawk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200411222346.36960.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it> Subject: [uml-devel] Re: 2.6.9-bb3 creates zombie threads in SKAS Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 23:46:36 +0100 To: "Christopher S. Aker" Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Bodo Stroesser On Monday 22 November 2004 23:23, Christopher S. Aker wrote: > Hello, Btw, question: what about your I/O token limiter? Actively using it? Could start being worked on for merge (there is at least one bug-report on it by "roland" on a strange but valid test-case). > I thought I'd give 2.6.9-bb3 a shot, and I had a bunch of users report the > accumiluation of zombies. What the hell! This should *not* happen. What did we (I mean developers) do? > This is on a 2.6.7 host, using your > host-skas3-2.6.7-v1 patch. ??? There is a ton of bugs in that patch (see the changelogs on my site). Actually, it's likely you're not going to be hurt by them if you're using NPTL on the host (it is *hard* to get them in that case), but you'd better upgrade. I have been releasing tons of updates, and even too quickly (most times I was not introducing new bugs, just fixing the ones I and Bodo Stroesser was finding) but -V1 is "a bit" old. That said, this should not happen. > I'm not sure if it happened on newer host > kernels, since I had to revert it back quickly. Back to what? To 2.6.9-bb2 or to 2.6.9? I'll check in these days what's going on... it was hyper-tested on 2.6.9 host (not by me, but I trust Bodo Stroesser normally), but not on other hosts, I guess. -- Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade Linux registered user n. 292729 ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel