From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it
Cc: jdike@addtoit.com, bstroesser@fujitsu-siemens.com,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [uml-devel] Re: [patch 1/2] Uml - first part rework of run_helper() and users.
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 15:20:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041130152017.129e134c.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041130200845.2C5058BAFE@zion.localdomain>
blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it wrote:
>
> Fixed a file descriptor leak in the network driver when changing an IP
> address.
>
> Fixed the error handling in run_helper.
>
>
> Paolo notes:
>
> Actually, this is part one of the change, the exact one extracted from Jeff
> Dike's incrementals tree before 2.6.9-rc big UML merge.
>
> There is some changes must be done, so I'm also sending a second patch with
> this one, too. Separated for tracking purposes.
>
> Don't send this pair of ones to Linus before Jeff ACK's it - just put into -mm for now.
That makes five UML patches which I have queued up pending confirmation:
hostfs-uml-set-sendfile-to-generic_file_sendfile.patch
hostfs-uml-add-some-other-pagecache-methods.patch
uml-terminal-cleanup.patch
uml-first-part-rework-of-run_helper-and-users.patch
uml-finish-fixing-run_helper-failure-path.patch
Could you gents please put heads together and tell me whether and when
these should go upstream?
Thanks.
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-30 23:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-30 20:08 [uml-devel] [patch 1/2] Uml - first part rework of run_helper() and users blaisorblade_spam
2004-11-30 23:20 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2004-12-01 0:20 ` [uml-devel] VFS interactions with UML and other big UML changes (was: Re: [patch 1/2] Uml - first part rework of run_helper() and users.) Blaisorblade
2004-12-01 0:33 ` [uml-devel] " Andrew Morton
2004-12-01 0:51 ` Blaisorblade
2004-12-01 9:02 ` Gerd Knorr
2004-12-02 1:41 ` [uml-devel] Re: [patch 1/2] Uml - first part rework of run_helper() and users Jeff Dike
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041130152017.129e134c.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it \
--cc=bstroesser@fujitsu-siemens.com \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox