From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1CoQWr-0004we-0y for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 10:14:05 -0800 Received: from pool-151-203-193-191.bos.east.verizon.net ([151.203.193.191] helo=ccure.user-mode-linux.org) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.41) id 1CoQWm-0001wc-DL for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 10:14:02 -0800 Message-Id: <200501112035.j0BKZZWi013652@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 11 Jan 2005 02:01:13 +0100." <200501110201.13651.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> References: <200501110201.13651.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Jeff Dike Subject: [uml-devel] Re: Bug in for-each-cpu-akpm from incrementals Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 15:35:35 -0500 To: Blaisorblade Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net blaisorblade@yahoo.it said: > You think that for_each_cpu() only iterates over online CPU, while you > should use for_each_online_cpu() for this purpose. Fixed in my tree, but there was method to my madness. I spotted this while reading the 2.6.10 patch, which has this: @@ -207,9 +212,8 @@ int show_interrupts(struct seq_file *p, if (i == 0) { seq_printf(p, " "); - for (j=0; j