linux-um archives
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
To: caker@linode.com
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [uml-devel] [PATCH] Fix stack corruption
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:56:22 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200501121856.j0CIuMiZ003766@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> (raw)

This patch fixes a long-standing problem in skas mode process creation.  Chris
Aker has been seeing it at linode, and found a way of reproducing it.  Once
I spotted the bug, I found an easier way:

ping flood the UML from the host while running
	while true; do ls > /dev/null; done

In 10-15 seconds, UML will simply exit back to the shell with a segfault,
no panic, no output, no nothing.

When UML sets up the kernel stack for a new process, it sends itself a 
SA_ONSTACK signal with the signal stack being the new kernel stack.  It 
calls setjmp there to set up a context that it can longjmp to when the new
process is run for the first time.

The problem was that, while signals were blocked during this, they were 
re-enabled before SA_ONSTACK was disabled.  Thus, a signal arriving at the
wrong time, between signals being turned on and SA_ONSTACK being disabled,
would cause the signal to be handled on the stack, destroying the context
that had been set up there.

When the new process ran, it would longjmp to this trashed stack, and UML
would die.

The fix is obvious:

Index: 2.6.10/arch/um/kernel/skas/process.c
===================================================================
--- 2.6.10.orig/arch/um/kernel/skas/process.c	2005-01-12 11:17:22.000000000 -0500
+++ 2.6.10/arch/um/kernel/skas/process.c	2005-01-12 11:18:03.000000000 -0500
@@ -323,9 +323,10 @@
 	block_signals();
 	if(sigsetjmp(fork_buf, 1) == 0)
 		new_thread_proc(stack, handler);
-	set_signals(flags);
 
 	remove_sigstack();
+
+	set_signals(flags);
 }
 
 void thread_wait(void *sw, void *fb)

				Jeff



-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

             reply	other threads:[~2005-01-12 18:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-12 18:56 Jeff Dike [this message]
2005-01-12 17:18 ` [uml-devel] [PATCH] Fix stack corruption Blaisorblade
2005-01-13 23:30 ` Christopher S. Aker
2005-01-14  0:27   ` Blaisorblade
2005-01-14  0:35     ` Christopher S. Aker
2005-01-14  0:42       ` Blaisorblade

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200501121856.j0CIuMiZ003766@ccure.user-mode-linux.org \
    --to=jdike@addtoit.com \
    --cc=caker@linode.com \
    --cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox