From: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Frank Sorenson <frank@tuxrocks.com>,
Doug Dumitru <doug@easyco.com>,
Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>,
"Christopher S. Aker" <caker@theshore.net>,
Bodo Stroesser <bstroesser@fujitsu-siemens.com>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] SKAS3: prerelease of V8 (against 2.6.9) uploaded
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 08:48:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200502010848.30042.rob@landley.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41FF261A.2070001@tuxrocks.com>
On Tuesday 01 February 2005 01:47 am, Frank Sorenson wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Doug Dumitru wrote:
> <snip>
>
> | With 2.6.9 skas3 v8 a plain kill does nothing. With a kill -9, 3 of the
> | four thread die, but one remains and the only way to get rid of it is
> | with a server reboot.
> |
> | Not sure what is going on here, but I have not been able to get anything
> | past 2.6.7 to work while killing virtual rudely.
>
> Will they die if you send a "kill -CONT" followed by the "kill -9"?
>
> Frank
If a kill -9 needs to be followed by a CONT signal to actually take effect on
a stopped process, why is this not a kernel bug? (Kill -9 is supposed to
_mean_ it. I've always thought of it as the "with shotgun" option...)
Rob
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-01 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-28 23:36 [uml-devel] SKAS3: prerelease of V8 (against 2.6.9) uploaded Blaisorblade
2005-02-01 3:10 ` Doug Dumitru
2005-02-01 6:47 ` Frank Sorenson
2005-02-01 13:48 ` Rob Landley [this message]
2005-02-01 15:26 ` Frank Sorenson
2005-02-01 16:27 ` Christopher S. Aker
2005-02-01 23:46 ` Doug Dumitru
2005-02-03 19:55 ` Blaisorblade
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200502010848.30042.rob@landley.net \
--to=rob@landley.net \
--cc=blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
--cc=bstroesser@fujitsu-siemens.com \
--cc=caker@theshore.net \
--cc=doug@easyco.com \
--cc=frank@tuxrocks.com \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox