From: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
To: "Sven Köhler" <skoehler@upb.de>
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Xen going to be in Kernel 2.6 soon?
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 13:50:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200502061850.j16Io3Uv003239@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 05 Feb 2005 02:45:24 +0100." <cu189b$vnr$1@sea.gmane.org>
skoehler@upb.de said:
> according to the german news-magazine heise.de, Xen will be in Kernel
> 2.6 soon.
What Linus is quoted as saying is that it will go into 2.6. This is consistent
with Xen going into 2.6.47 or something. I don't get the feeling that it
will go in soon because aspects of the design are fairly controversial.
> I feel like this is a slap in Jeff's face, since i thought
> that UML will be developed as the first choice in virtualizations
> techniques.
UML has never has any sort of privileged status. Never has, never will.
Everything has to compete on its merits.
> I also thought, that UML will perhaps soon be as fast as
> Xen since SKAS4 is on horizon.
skas4 is an interface change, not a speedup. As far as speed goes, I have
a bunch of nice things in my current patchset, like skas0, system call and
tlb flushing optimizations. Also, we (me and some other Intel people) are
working on having UML support Intel's VT virtualization extensions, which
will bring it much closer to hardware speed.
So, as Rob Landley pointed out, except with much more sarcasm, the sky is
not falling.
Jeff
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-06 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-05 1:45 [uml-devel] Xen going to be in Kernel 2.6 soon? Sven Köhler
2005-02-05 2:13 ` Sky, comma, falling. (Was Re: [uml-devel] Xen going to be in Kernel 2.6 soon?) Rob Landley
2005-02-05 14:46 ` Sven Köhler
2005-02-05 15:10 ` Rob Landley
2005-02-07 9:56 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2005-02-07 13:43 ` Rob Landley
2005-02-06 18:50 ` Jeff Dike [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200502061850.j16Io3Uv003239@ccure.user-mode-linux.org \
--to=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=skoehler@upb.de \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox