From: Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Frank Sorenson <frank@tuxrocks.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Fix compilation of UML after the stack-randomization patches
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 18:33:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200502071833.13571.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4203CF43.20703@tuxrocks.com>
On Friday 04 February 2005 20:38, Frank Sorenson wrote:
> The stack randomization patches that went into 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 broke
> compilation of ARCH=um. This patch fixes compiling by adding
> arch_align_stack back in.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Sorenson <frank@tuxrocks.com>
> Acked-By: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
I've just spotted that if the function is arch-dependent it means that for us
it will be subarch-dependant.
I've the doubt that the addition would better go under sys-i386 or some other
subarch-dependent directories (in a file compiled against kernelspace
headers, i.e. not listed in USER_OBJS in the directory it's contained
inside), and it'd be nice to add also the x86_64 version.
--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux registered user n. 292729
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-07 18:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-04 19:38 [uml-devel] Fix compilation of UML after the stack-randomization patches Frank Sorenson
2005-02-07 17:33 ` Blaisorblade [this message]
2005-02-07 22:22 ` Jeff Dike
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200502071833.13571.blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
--to=blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
--cc=frank@tuxrocks.com \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox