From: Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cam.ac.uk>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Re: [BUG report] UML linux-2.6 latest BK doesn't compile
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 18:48:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200502081848.46270.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1107859254.582.4.camel@imp.csi.cam.ac.uk>
On Tuesday 08 February 2005 11:40, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 11:22 +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > On Tuesday 08 February 2005 11:09, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > With the current linux-2.6 BK tree I get this when trying to compile
> > > UML:
> > >
> > > CC init/version.o
> > > LD init/built-in.o
> > > LD .tmp_vmlinux1
> > > arch/um/kernel/built-in.o(__ksymtab+0x2b0): In function `um_execve':
> > > arch/um/kernel/exec_kern.c:59: undefined reference to `__bb_init_func'
> > > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> > > KSYM .tmp_kallsyms1.S
> > > nm: '.tmp_vmlinux1': No such file
> > > /bin/bash: line 1: 26161 Exit 1 nm -n .tmp_vmlinux1
> > > 26162 Segmentation fault | scripts/kallsyms >.tmp_kallsyms1.S
> > > make: *** [.tmp_kallsyms1.S] Error 139
> > >
> > > This is with SKAS mode enabled and TT disabled. My .config is
> > > attached.
> >
> > Hmm - I do not understand at all where `__bb_init_func' comes from (not
> > from UML by sure, only from kernel headers possibly). And from
> > preprocessing the source (of the -bk4 snapshot), nothing similar comes
> > out.
>
> It is from UML. 'bk -r grep __bb_init_func' gives:
>
> arch/um/kernel/gmon_syms.c 1.1 extern void __bb_init_func(void
> *);
> arch/um/kernel/gmon_syms.c 1.1 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__bb_init_func);
>
> The kernel compiles fine with the same .config but TT mode also enabled.
> So I suspect that in the non-TT case the gmon_syms binary
> linked into the kernel
I think it *is* still linked.
> so the symbol is missing or something like
> that...
Hmm, the difference is likely in the build commands:
1) Simply because the build is dynamic in the non-TT mode case (no idea)
2) bug in Makefiles.... but I didn't see anything strange:
arch/um/Makefile-skas (included only when SKAS mode is enabled):
PROFILE += -pg
CFLAGS-$(CONFIG_GCOV) += -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage
CFLAGS-$(CONFIG_GPROF) += $(PROFILE)
LINK-$(CONFIG_GPROF) += $(PROFILE)
the Makefiles were heavily changed, however, recently (after 2.6.10).
> Also note I am using the latest BK as pulled about an hour ago. I don't
> know how old the snapshot you are using is in comparison.
Last daily snapshot, when I posted. (Now we are at -bk5). However I only built
the file on which you saw the warning, not everything.
> Lots of UML
> changes were pulled in by my pull...
--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux registered user n. 292729
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-08 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1107857395.15872.2.camel@imp.csi.cam.ac.uk>
2005-02-08 10:22 ` [uml-devel] Re: [BUG report] UML linux-2.6 latest BK doesn't compile Blaisorblade
2005-02-08 10:40 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2005-02-08 17:48 ` Blaisorblade [this message]
2005-02-08 22:21 ` Jeff Dike
[not found] ` <200502081829.j18ITAs0003968@ccure.user-mode-linux.org>
2005-02-08 17:37 ` Blaisorblade
2005-02-08 22:22 ` Jeff Dike
2005-02-14 11:35 ` [uml-devel] Partial fix! - Was: " Anton Altaparmakov
2005-02-16 18:27 ` Blaisorblade
2005-03-05 19:45 ` [uml-devel] " Jeff Dike
2005-03-05 18:31 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-03-07 19:44 ` Blaisorblade
2005-03-08 0:10 ` Jeff Dike
2005-03-13 20:06 ` Blaisorblade
2006-09-08 22:25 ` [uml-devel] " i.r.wezeman
2006-09-09 9:31 ` Blaisorblade
[not found] ` <EBD0B8CF381E8B44BB99E8EA137E27C0021AD015@CPEXBE-EML06.kpnsp.local>
2006-09-09 15:30 ` Blaisorblade
2006-09-11 15:27 ` Jeff Dike
2006-09-17 18:04 ` Blaisorblade
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200502081848.46270.blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
--to=blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
--cc=aia21@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox