From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1D0PlN-00084L-MI for User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 11:50:37 -0800 Received: from lakshmi.addtoit.com ([198.99.130.6] helo=lakshmi.solana.com) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1D0PlL-0002XY-Kb for User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 11:50:37 -0800 Message-Id: <200502132151.j1DLoxnW003492@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 13 Feb 2005 19:58:39 +0100." References: <200502131813.j1DICsnW002251@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <20050213164652.GE8859@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Jeff Dike Subject: [uml-devel] Re: [PATCH] uml: support a separate build tree; support USER_OBJS dependencies Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 16:50:59 -0500 To: Vadim Abrossimov Cc: Al Viro , User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net vadim_abrossimov@yahoo.com said: > Apparently my changes to support 'O=' are quite obsolete: Not entirely - it's nice to see the same changes from two different sources, although the first source was Al, which greatly reduces the chances that they are wrong... > The second change proposed in my patch concerned USER_OBJS > dependences: I removed specific rules using the generic Kbuild rule > just overwriting 'c_flags': > I agree that it's not very elegant and robust but it does the job and > could be useful until Kbuild will provide a clean way to do it. It is still better than what I have now. > If you think useful, I may create a patch with this change only. > Should I do it against 2.6.10 as an add-on to the http:// > user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/patches.html tarball? Yup, that would be useful. > That lead me to another question: why we don't use directly BitKeeper? > We could have a repository for uml development. I used BK for a while. I just found that quilt fits my development style better. Jeff ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel