From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1D0Unj-0007q5-DH for User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 17:13:23 -0800 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252] ident=93) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.41) id 1D0Unh-0007xE-Vl for User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 17:13:23 -0800 From: Al Viro Message-ID: <20050214011317.GG8859@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <200502131813.j1DICsnW002251@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <20050213164652.GE8859@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <200502132151.j1DLoxnW003492@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200502132151.j1DLoxnW003492@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> Subject: [uml-devel] Re: [PATCH] uml: support a separate build tree; support USER_OBJS dependencies Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 01:13:17 +0000 To: Jeff Dike Cc: Vadim Abrossimov , User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 04:50:59PM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote: > vadim_abrossimov@yahoo.com said: > > Apparently my changes to support 'O=' are quite obsolete: > > Not entirely - it's nice to see the same changes from two different sources, > although the first source was Al, which greatly reduces the chances that they > are wrong... Not particulary, seeing that I've done almost no work on kbuild-related stuff... > > The second change proposed in my patch concerned USER_OBJS > > dependences: I removed specific rules using the generic Kbuild rule > > just overwriting 'c_flags': > > > I agree that it's not very elegant and robust but it does the job and > > could be useful until Kbuild will provide a clean way to do it. > > It is still better than what I have now. ACK. AFAICS, other parts of patch are already covered, except for adding arch/um/include/sysdep to search path. Why do we need that? Files in there get included as , not , so... ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel