From: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
To: Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] 2.6.9-bs7 panic on check_sysemu
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 00:59:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200504060059.04907.rob@landley.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200504052255.39254.blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 04:55 pm, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > Speaking of which, I ask this from time to time:
> >
> > What's the minimal patch set that _just_ adds -SKAS0 mode to something
> > like a 2.6.11 kernel? I'd like to try it out, but every time I sit down
> > to whack at it my interest budget runs out sifting through a mountain of
> > unrelated x86-64 patches to try to figure out what exactly I need to
> > apply to get just SKAS0...
>
> Also, I forgot: during your development work use SKAS. It doesn't give any
> big difference visible inside the Virtual Machine (except for bugs).
I'm trying out the build on various different systems: knoppix, red hat, suse,
debian. In some cases running on borrowed machines, in other cases running
on a knoppix boot cd. (I care because I'm using the host tools, which vary
slightly from system to system.)
You just suggested that I replace the kernels on all of these systems,
(including other people's machines, and the bootable CD that uses a kernel
with the cloop patch applied and an initramfs that's hard to extract) with a
different kernel. Just so I'm testing something faster that's not actually
what I'm going to be deploying.
If I was going to replace the host kernel and run on a modified system, I'd
just A) replace it with the version I actually need, B) run the build as root
and use chroot instead of UML.
I'm interested in SKAS0 because it's potentially deployable. Any SKAS that
requires a modified host kernel is not, for my purposes.
Rob
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-06 7:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-03 22:47 [uml-devel] 2.6.9-bs7 panic on check_sysemu Peter
2005-04-04 13:32 ` Blaisorblade
2005-04-05 17:23 ` Rob Landley
2005-04-05 20:54 ` Blaisorblade
2005-04-05 20:55 ` Blaisorblade
2005-04-06 4:59 ` Rob Landley [this message]
2005-04-06 0:24 ` Jeff Dike
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200504060059.04907.rob@landley.net \
--to=rob@landley.net \
--cc=blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox