From: Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>, "Wesley W. Terpstra" <wesley@terpstra.ca>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] MacOS X port?
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 17:58:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200504191758.32356.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050418140559.GA4219@ccure.user-mode-linux.org>
On Monday 18 April 2005 16:05, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 01:31:14PM +0200, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
> > Hi, I know that user-mode-linux has been ported to linux/ppc already.
> > What I was wondering is if there was work underway to port it to MacOS X?
> > That is to say, running a linux kernel from the BSD-ish MacOS X userland.
> >
> > This would be really cool; it would mean MacOS X users could run linux
> > applications 'natively' under UML with X forwarding to MacOS X's X
> > server. I couldn't imagine a more ideal configuration. :-)
> >
> > How hard would such an undertaking be?
>
> That's an OS port, which is very different from an arch port. There is
> work underway (see the os abstraction patches at
> http://user-mode-linux.sf.net/patches.html) to make UML OS-portable.
>
> arch/um/include/os.h will show you what you currently have to implement for
> a new OS. This is subject to change since we have only moved the existing
> OS-specific stuff and not tried to rationalize it yet.
>
> Jeff
Currently (i.e. in committed code, not counting the changes mentioned above),
os.h abstracts away mostly some file access and process handling functions.
That said, to do such a port there is the need for a Mac OS X developer...
since Mac OS X is still Unix that should not be too hard, but I don't know.
For instance, does ptrace() exists (check via "man ptrace")? I think that
incapsulating this call is not a work in progress, and it won't be until we
don't have at least another API to port UML to.
Also, I heard rumors of a FreeBSD port (although I don't remember if it was
just a request); since the FreeBSD roots of MacOSX, a lot of code could
probably be shared by those ports.
--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux registered user n. 292729
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI.
Version 11 adds new functionality designed to reduce time involved in
creating, integrating, and deploying reporting solutions. Free runtime info,
new features, or free trial, at: http://www.businessobjects.com/devxi/728
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-19 19:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-18 11:31 [uml-devel] MacOS X port? Wesley W. Terpstra
2005-04-18 14:05 ` Jeff Dike
2005-04-19 15:58 ` Blaisorblade [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200504191758.32356.blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
--to=blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=wesley@terpstra.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox