From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1DPm8A-00064R-BJ for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 11:46:58 -0700 Received: from smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.11.35]) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 4.41) id 1DPm89-0000Np-Ml for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 11:46:58 -0700 From: Blaisorblade References: <4253E3D6.2000809@fujitsu-siemens.com> <200504241644.38016.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> <20050424165112.GA4598@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> In-Reply-To: <20050424165112.GA4598@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504242044.04625.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Subject: [uml-devel] Re: UML-patches to prepare UML/s390 Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 20:44:04 +0200 To: Jeff Dike Cc: Bodo Stroesser , user-mode-linux devel On Sunday 24 April 2005 18:51, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 04:44:37PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > > Btw, many of the code movement things are just cut'n'paste things, so for > > them there is no reason to delay them. Now we are going to merge them for > > 2.6.13-rc1 (for .12 it's too late), but every other delay increases the > > possibility that we fix somehow the code we are moving and forget to do > > the same on the moved code. > Yeah, that's a concern. I'm holding onto the code movement because I want > to look at the os interface that resulted from it, and see if it can be > cleaned up. Happy for that. > > Finally, about the syscall table patches for s390: I'm going to merge > > into -mm the syscall table patches you can find in the last -devel > > snapshot I put on my page (the uploaded ones maybe are out-of-date, but > > I'll cc you on patches). > What patch is this? All I see is a patch which makes some small fixes to > the sys_call_table. No, I don't mean -bs, I mean the DEVEL snapshot. It's under patches/devel-guest/, and other will follow (when I have broad-band). However the updated patches are flying to you (plural, since they also relate with s390 port). > > They entirely remove the UML syscall table to replace it with the > > $(SUBARCH) one (there is some hand-work to do for each subarch but it's > > much less than before). While doing this I also fixed various little bugs > > about this subject. > > Don't send that anywhere until I've seen it. Your description of it makes > me nervous. I'm sending it for -mm only, and it's marked as such. Also it won't silently slip since it acts a bit on i386. -- Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade Skype user "PaoloGiarrusso" Linux registered user n. 292729 http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel