linux-um archives
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
To: Al Viro <viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sam@ravnborg.org,
	Ryan Anderson <ryan@michonline.com>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Re: [UML] Compile error when building with seperate source and object directories
Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 21:14:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200505022114.06062.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050501160707.GI13052@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>

On Sunday 01 May 2005 18:07, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 01:30:57PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > For now I've added an #ifdef to re-include that code for x86, while
> > excluding it for x86_64. Also, is that up-to-date wrt. 2.6.12-rc3?
>
> Yes, it is.  As for the ptrace.c...  IMO the right thing is
> per-architecture helper here.  Such ifdefs are OK when it's just i386 and
> amd64.  As soon as e.g. uml/s390 gets merged or uml/ia64 and uml/ppc get
> resurrected...
Agreed, I've done it this way to reintroduce for now the code for i386. It's 
anyway kludgy, since amd64 has too its debug registers to handle (at least it 
should); it's just that UML does not handle them yet.
-- 
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Skype user "PaoloGiarrusso"
Linux registered user n. 292729
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4
opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to
win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

      reply	other threads:[~2005-05-02 19:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-27  3:02 [uml-devel] [UML] Compile error when building with seperate source and object directories Ryan Anderson
2005-04-27 23:45 ` [uml-devel] " Al Viro
2005-04-28  5:40   ` Ryan Anderson
2005-04-28 20:26   ` Jeff Dike
2005-04-28 21:53     ` Al Viro
2005-05-01 11:30       ` Blaisorblade
2005-05-01 16:07         ` Al Viro
2005-05-02 19:14           ` Blaisorblade [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200505022114.06062.blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
    --to=blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
    --cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ryan@michonline.com \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox