From: Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
jdike@addtoit.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@suse.de
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Re: [patch 1/1] Uml: kludgy compilation fixes for x86-64 subarch modules support [for -mm]
Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 21:01:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200505042101.30458.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050502165103.6d76f394.akpm@osdl.org>
On Tuesday 03 May 2005 01:51, Andrew Morton wrote:
> blaisorblade@yahoo.it wrote:
> > These are some trivial fixes for the x86-64 subarch module support. The
> > only potential problem is that I have to modify
> > arch/x86_64/kernel/module.c, to avoid copying the whole of it.
> >
> > I can't use it verbatim because it depends on a special vmalloc-like area
> > for modules, which for now (maybe that's to fix, I guess not) UML/x86-64
> > has not. I went the easy way and reused the i386 vmalloc()-based
> > allocator.
>
> Why is this "for -mm" and not for -linus?
That's a report on the current "review/testing" status, in this case because I
wanted an ACK from Andi Kleen. Which acked it for himself but warned about
the possible breakage for other archs.
--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Skype user "PaoloGiarrusso"
Linux registered user n. 292729
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4
opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to
win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-04 19:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-01 18:45 [uml-devel] [patch 1/1] Uml: kludgy compilation fixes for x86-64 subarch modules support [for -mm] blaisorblade
2005-05-02 16:40 ` [uml-devel] " Andi Kleen
2005-05-02 23:51 ` Andrew Morton
2005-05-04 19:01 ` Blaisorblade [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200505042101.30458.blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
--to=blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox