From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1DbzLK-0002XQ-0B for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 28 May 2005 04:19:02 -0700 Received: from smtp003.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.11.34]) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 4.41) id 1DbzLI-0004OR-GE for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 28 May 2005 04:19:01 -0700 From: Blaisorblade References: <20050527003843.433BA1AEE88@zion.home.lan> <200505270306.09425.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> <20050527033126.GH1329@linux-sh.org> In-Reply-To: <20050527033126.GH1329@linux-sh.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200505281321.03246.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Subject: [uml-devel] Re: [patch 4/8] irq code: Add coherence test for PREEMPT_ACTIVE Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 13:21:02 +0200 To: Paul Mundt Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linuxsh-shmedia-dev@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-sh@m17n.org, dhowells@redhat.com On Friday 27 May 2005 05:31, Paul Mundt wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 03:06:09AM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > > On Friday 27 May 2005 02:38, blaisorblade@yahoo.it wrote: > > Ok, a grep shows that possible culprits (i.e. giving success to > > grep GENERIC_HARDIRQS arch/*/Kconfig, and using 0x4000000 as > > PREEMPT_ACTIVE, as given by grep PREEMPT_ACTIVE > > include/asm-*/thread_info.h) are (at a first glance): frv, sh, sh64. > Yeah, that's bogus for sh and sh64 anyways, this should do it. > It would be nice to move PRREMPT_ACTIVE so it isn't per-arch anymore, > there's not many users that use a different value (at least for the ones > using generic hardirqs, ia64 seems to be the only one?). Then in the generic headers #ifndef PREEMPT_ACTIVE #define PREEMPT_ACTIVE #else #endif Would be ok, right? -- Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade Skype user "PaoloGiarrusso" Linux registered user n. 292729 http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade ___________________________________ Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB http://mail.yahoo.it ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo. Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo! Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005 _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel