From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1DoVWA-0000dZ-Ez for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 17:05:58 -0700 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.41) id 1DoVW9-0001fw-RX for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 17:05:58 -0700 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/2] UML - skas0 - separate kernel address space on stock hosts Message-Id: <20050701170648.2762c702.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <200507020157.37593.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> References: <200507012131.j61LVCLi027276@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <20050701145802.5cebabd2.akpm@osdl.org> <200507020157.37593.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 17:06:48 -0700 To: Blaisorblade Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, jdike@addtoit.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it Blaisorblade wrote: > > On Friday 01 July 2005 23:58, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Jeff Dike wrote: > > > This patch implements something very close to skas mode for hosts > > > which don't support skas - I'm calling this skas0. > > > > I note that this patch assumes that > > uml-kill-some-useless-vmalloc-tlb-flushing.patch is applied. > > You're fixing the conflict anyway since it's little, correct? Well I can fix the reject if we decide that uml-kill-some-useless-vmalloc-tlb-flushing.patch is not to be applied, but it seems that there's no need. > However, for now it seems that I can't reproduce anyway the iptables crash, > and even Jeff did some testing... so it seems it's ok. OK.. Now what about uml-remove-winch-sem.patch? I have a "keep this in -mm" sign next to it. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel