From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1DoVIc-00005i-0u for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 16:51:58 -0700 Received: from smtp003.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.11.34]) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 4.41) id 1DoVIY-0006sw-1n for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 16:51:57 -0700 From: Blaisorblade Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/2] UML - skas0 - separate kernel address space on stock hosts References: <200507012131.j61LVCLi027276@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <20050701145802.5cebabd2.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20050701145802.5cebabd2.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200507020157.37593.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2005 01:57:36 +0200 To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Andrew Morton , Jeff Dike , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "blaisorblade@yahoo.it" On Friday 01 July 2005 23:58, Andrew Morton wrote: > Jeff Dike wrote: > > This patch implements something very close to skas mode for hosts > > which don't support skas - I'm calling this skas0. > > I note that this patch assumes that > uml-kill-some-useless-vmalloc-tlb-flushing.patch is applied. You're fixing the conflict anyway since it's little, correct? > AFAIK that patch is still in limbo due to objections from Paolo. Can we > sort that out please? Ok, I'm going to test that out in the offending configuration. If that works, then Jeff will explain us why the same (rephrased) patch didn't work in 2.4 and works in 2.6. When we have an explaination about that, I'll be very happy about merging the patch. For myself, I don't even know why it didn't work in 2.4, I hadn't the knowledge and haven't the time. People got breakage and when searching for it that looked the most invasive change, so I suggested removing and tests confirmed that. However, for now it seems that I can't reproduce anyway the iptables crash, and even Jeff did some testing... so it seems it's ok. -- Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!". Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894) http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade ___________________________________ Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB http://mail.yahoo.it ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel