From: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
To: blaisorblade@yahoo.it
Cc: stable@kernel.org, jdike@addtoit.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [uml-devel] Re: [stable] [patch 1/1] uml: fix TT mode by reverting "use fork instead of clone"
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 11:50:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050712185023.GY19052@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050712172838.271E8D9A84@zion.home.lan>
* blaisorblade@yahoo.it (blaisorblade@yahoo.it) wrote:
> Revert the following patch, because of miscompilation problems in different
> environments leading to UML not working *at all* in TT mode; it was merged
> lately in 2.6 development cycle, a little after being written, and has caused
> problems to lots of people; I know it's a bit too long, but it shouldn't have
> been merged in first place, so I still apply for inclusion in the -stable
> tree. Anyone using this feature currently is either using some older kernel
> (some reports even used 2.6.12-rc4-mm2) or using this patch, as included in my
> -bs patchset.
>
> For now there's not yet a fix for this patch, so for now the best thing is to
> drop it (which was widely reported to give a working kernel).
And upstream will leave this in, working to real fix?
thanks,
-chris
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar happening
July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in dual
core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted by HP,
AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-12 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-12 17:28 [uml-devel] [patch 1/1] uml: fix TT mode by reverting "use fork instead of clone" blaisorblade
2005-07-12 18:50 ` Chris Wright [this message]
2005-07-13 13:33 ` [uml-devel] Re: [stable] " Blaisorblade
2005-07-13 16:26 ` Chris Wright
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050712185023.GY19052@shell0.pdx.osdl.net \
--to=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox