From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1DshF9-0003e6-AQ for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 06:25:43 -0700 Received: from smtp001.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.11.32]) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 4.44) id 1DshF4-0004os-IL for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 06:25:43 -0700 From: Blaisorblade References: <20050712172838.271E8D9A84@zion.home.lan> <20050712185023.GY19052@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> In-Reply-To: <20050712185023.GY19052@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507131533.00817.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Subject: [uml-devel] Re: [stable] [patch 1/1] uml: fix TT mode by reverting "use fork instead of clone" Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 15:33:00 +0200 To: Chris Wright Cc: stable@kernel.org, jdike@addtoit.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Tuesday 12 July 2005 20:50, Chris Wright wrote: > * blaisorblade@yahoo.it (blaisorblade@yahoo.it) wrote: > > Revert the following patch, because of miscompilation problems in > > different environments leading to UML not working *at all* in TT mode; it > > was merged lately in 2.6 development cycle, a little after being written, > > and has caused problems to lots of people; I know it's a bit too long, > > but it shouldn't have been merged in first place, so I still apply for > > inclusion in the -stable tree. Anyone using this feature currently is > > either using some older kernel (some reports even used 2.6.12-rc4-mm2) or > > using this patch, as included in my -bs patchset. > > For now there's not yet a fix for this patch, so for now the best thing > > is to drop it (which was widely reported to give a working kernel). > And upstream will leave this in, working to real fix? Preferably yes, but this depends on whether the fix is found. Otherwise this exact patch will be merged upstream too. -- Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!". Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894) http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade ___________________________________ Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB http://mail.yahoo.it ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar happening July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in dual core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted by HP, AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel