From: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
To: Bodo Stroesser <bstroesser@fujitsu-siemens.com>
Cc: user-mode-linux devel
<user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
BlaisorBlade <blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it>
Subject: [uml-devel] Re: Some changes in SKAS0
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 13:09:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050812170900.GC7448@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42D7D802.2080100@fujitsu-siemens.com>
From our discussion yesterday, ...
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 05:36:34PM +0200, Bodo Stroesser wrote:
> So I thought about avoiding the sigreturn at all. Working on
> this I found out some small points:
I kept this patch
> - there is a bug (typo) in wait_stub_done()
but dropped these two, plus my dont-save-fpregs patch. Correct?
> - stopping stub_segv_handler with a "breakpoint" without
> calling sigreturn, lets SIGSEGV being blocked after that.
> At the next SIGSEGV, I see stub_wait_done() calling panic
> just as with Rob's problem. And I see the child being gone!
> I understand, that the host unblocks SIGSEGV and sets the
> handler to SIG_DFL. But I don't understand, why the child
> already is gone after the waitpid(), without resuming it.
> I guess, this is the reason for Rob not being able to debug
> the problem.
> Thus I added SA_NOMASK to the flags for the handler.
>
> - I changed the additional mask for the handler to be empty.
> The only exception is x86_64, that currently must use sigreturn
> and therefore still masks SIGUSR1 while the handler runs.
> In skas, userspace shouldn't receive SIGIO or SIGWINCH (I hope
> I'm right here?), SIGVTALRM already is handled by wait_stub_done.
> Then I changed i386's stub_segv_handler to stop using "int3"
> immediately after saving faultinfo.
> This new method saves some syscalls on i386 and s390 and
> simplifies s390.
Jeff
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-12 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-15 15:36 [uml-devel] Some changes in SKAS0 Bodo Stroesser
2005-07-15 20:47 ` [uml-devel] " Jeff Dike
2005-07-30 15:54 ` Jeff Dike
2005-08-05 11:43 ` Bodo Stroesser
2005-08-12 17:09 ` Jeff Dike [this message]
2005-09-13 13:17 ` Bodo Stroesser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050812170900.GC7448@ccure.user-mode-linux.org \
--to=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it \
--cc=bstroesser@fujitsu-siemens.com \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox