linux-um archives
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>, Allan Graves <allan.graves@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] stack and scheduler patches
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 13:51:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200509041351.32837.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050902165935.GA6651@ccure.user-mode-linux.org>

On Friday 02 September 2005 18:59, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 07:06:33PM -0400, Allan Graves wrote:
> > Jeff,
> > Here's the patches.  Hope these meet your approval!
Could you please write a proper changelog? Reading a patch is possible, but 
needs time which I don't have in the very moment.

Also, what is the difference between your "stack trace" patch, which adds a 
member to thread_struct, for each process, so I'd like a minimum of 
justification, and one of the sysrq options which does exactly this?

Apart that the second is currently buggy, and is global, as in what you plan 
here:

/* Would be nice:
+           1) Send showregs output to mconsole.
+           2) Add a way to stack dump all pids.
+        */

Sorry if these questions seem bad - but that's why changelogs are used.
> > Allan

-- 
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!".
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894)
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade

	

	
		
___________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB 
http://mail.yahoo.it



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2005-09-04 11:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-08-31 23:06 [uml-devel] stack and scheduler patches Allan Graves
2005-09-02 16:59 ` Jeff Dike
2005-09-04 11:51   ` Blaisorblade [this message]
2005-09-06 15:37     ` Jeff Dike
2005-09-06 16:10     ` [uml-devel] sched and stack patch changelogs Allan Graves
2005-09-06 15:46   ` [uml-devel] stack and scheduler patches Allan Graves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200509041351.32837.blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
    --to=blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
    --cc=allan.graves@oracle.com \
    --cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
    --cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox