From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1EMCVw-00039E-W3 for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 15:41:01 -0700 Received: from smtp006.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.11.95]) by mail.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 4.44) id 1EM2Mi-0004m0-LZ for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 04:50:51 -0700 From: Blaisorblade References: <200510021213.40191.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> <20051002113806.GO7992@ftp.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20051002113806.GO7992@ftp.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200510021350.29959.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Subject: [uml-devel] Re: UML/2.6.14-rc3 doesn't work fixes Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2005 13:50:28 +0200 To: Al Viro Cc: Jeff Dike , user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Alexander Viro On Sunday 02 October 2005 13:38, Al Viro wrote: > On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 12:13:39PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > > The patch in Al Viro's: > > ecba97d4aacf4e80c56eb73e39af0369cb8539a4 > > messed up UML (in particular skas0, which doesn't boot any more - or > > maybe it boots one out of 10 times). > > Btw: did Al CC you on it, at least? > Yes. Moreover, that had also been done two weeks ago when original version > of patch had been sent for review to Jeff. Who'd caught that one and other > bugs and sent the fixed variant back. At which point I'd fscked up the > merge. Ok, you're excused... now, however, I still think that this should be postponed to 2.6.15, since it's a (very nice, indeed) cleanup and we're nearing completion. Al, did you receive my "[PATCH 5/5] uml: remove empty hostfs_truncate method"? What about that? I'm nervous because the whole batch was lost somewhere without merging, it seems (and it has a couple of other critical fixes). -- Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!". Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894) http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade ___________________________________ Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB http://mail.yahoo.it ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel