From: "Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso" <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
To: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [uml-devel] [PATCH 02/11] Uml: fix access_ok
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 00:01:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051025220107.20010.57705.stgit@zion.home.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051025220053.20010.56979.stgit@zion.home.lan>
From: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
The access_ok_tt() macro is bogus, in that a read access is unconditionally
considered valid.
I couldn't find in SCM logs the introduction of this check, but I went back to
2.4.20-1um and the definition was the same.
Possibly this was done to avoid problems with missing set_fs() calls, but there
can't be any I think because they would fail with SKAS mode. TT-specific code is
still to check.
Also, this patch joins common code together, and makes the "address range
wrapping" check happen for all cases, rather than for only some.
This may, possibly, be reoptimized at some time, but the current code doesn't
seem clever, just confused.
* Important: I've also had to change references to access_ok_{tt,skas} back to
access_ok - the kernel wasn't that happy otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
---
arch/um/include/um_uaccess.h | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
arch/um/kernel/skas/include/uaccess-skas.h | 10 ++--------
arch/um/kernel/skas/uaccess.c | 8 ++++----
arch/um/kernel/tt/include/uaccess-tt.h | 8 +-------
arch/um/kernel/tt/uaccess.c | 8 ++++----
5 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/um/include/um_uaccess.h b/arch/um/include/um_uaccess.h
--- a/arch/um/include/um_uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/um/include/um_uaccess.h
@@ -17,8 +17,25 @@
#include "uaccess-skas.h"
#endif
+#define __under_task_size(addr, size) \
+ (((unsigned long) (addr) < TASK_SIZE) && \
+ (((unsigned long) (addr) + (size)) < TASK_SIZE))
+
+#define __access_ok_vsyscall(type, addr, size) \
+ ((type == VERIFY_READ) && \
+ ((unsigned long) (addr) >= FIXADDR_USER_START) && \
+ ((unsigned long) (addr) + (size) <= FIXADDR_USER_END) && \
+ ((unsigned long) (addr) + (size) >= (unsigned long)(addr)))
+
+#define __addr_range_nowrap(addr, size) \
+ ((unsigned long) (addr) <= ((unsigned long) (addr) + (size)))
+
#define access_ok(type, addr, size) \
- CHOOSE_MODE_PROC(access_ok_tt, access_ok_skas, type, addr, size)
+ (__addr_range_nowrap(addr, size) && \
+ (__under_task_size(addr, size) || \
+ __access_ok_vsyscall(type, addr, size) || \
+ segment_eq(get_fs(), KERNEL_DS) || \
+ CHOOSE_MODE_PROC(access_ok_tt, access_ok_skas, type, addr, size)))
static inline int copy_from_user(void *to, const void __user *from, int n)
{
diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/skas/include/uaccess-skas.h b/arch/um/kernel/skas/include/uaccess-skas.h
--- a/arch/um/kernel/skas/include/uaccess-skas.h
+++ b/arch/um/kernel/skas/include/uaccess-skas.h
@@ -9,14 +9,8 @@
#include "asm/errno.h"
#include "asm/fixmap.h"
-#define access_ok_skas(type, addr, size) \
- ((segment_eq(get_fs(), KERNEL_DS)) || \
- (((unsigned long) (addr) < TASK_SIZE) && \
- ((unsigned long) (addr) + (size) <= TASK_SIZE)) || \
- ((type == VERIFY_READ ) && \
- ((unsigned long) (addr) >= FIXADDR_USER_START) && \
- ((unsigned long) (addr) + (size) <= FIXADDR_USER_END) && \
- ((unsigned long) (addr) + (size) >= (unsigned long)(addr))))
+/* No SKAS-specific checking. */
+#define access_ok_skas(type, addr, size) 0
extern int copy_from_user_skas(void *to, const void __user *from, int n);
extern int copy_to_user_skas(void __user *to, const void *from, int n);
diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/skas/uaccess.c b/arch/um/kernel/skas/uaccess.c
--- a/arch/um/kernel/skas/uaccess.c
+++ b/arch/um/kernel/skas/uaccess.c
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ int copy_from_user_skas(void *to, const
return(0);
}
- return(access_ok_skas(VERIFY_READ, from, n) ?
+ return(access_ok(VERIFY_READ, from, n) ?
buffer_op((unsigned long) from, n, 0, copy_chunk_from_user, &to):
n);
}
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ int copy_to_user_skas(void __user *to, c
return(0);
}
- return(access_ok_skas(VERIFY_WRITE, to, n) ?
+ return(access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, to, n) ?
buffer_op((unsigned long) to, n, 1, copy_chunk_to_user, &from) :
n);
}
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ int strncpy_from_user_skas(char *dst, co
return(strnlen(dst, count));
}
- if(!access_ok_skas(VERIFY_READ, src, 1))
+ if(!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, src, 1))
return(-EFAULT);
n = buffer_op((unsigned long) src, count, 0, strncpy_chunk_from_user,
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ int clear_user_skas(void __user *mem, in
return(0);
}
- return(access_ok_skas(VERIFY_WRITE, mem, len) ?
+ return(access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, mem, len) ?
buffer_op((unsigned long) mem, len, 1, clear_chunk, NULL) : len);
}
diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/tt/include/uaccess-tt.h b/arch/um/kernel/tt/include/uaccess-tt.h
--- a/arch/um/kernel/tt/include/uaccess-tt.h
+++ b/arch/um/kernel/tt/include/uaccess-tt.h
@@ -19,19 +19,13 @@
extern unsigned long end_vm;
extern unsigned long uml_physmem;
-#define under_task_size(addr, size) \
- (((unsigned long) (addr) < TASK_SIZE) && \
- (((unsigned long) (addr) + (size)) < TASK_SIZE))
-
#define is_stack(addr, size) \
(((unsigned long) (addr) < STACK_TOP) && \
((unsigned long) (addr) >= STACK_TOP - ABOVE_KMEM) && \
(((unsigned long) (addr) + (size)) <= STACK_TOP))
#define access_ok_tt(type, addr, size) \
- ((type == VERIFY_READ) || (segment_eq(get_fs(), KERNEL_DS)) || \
- (((unsigned long) (addr) <= ((unsigned long) (addr) + (size))) && \
- (under_task_size(addr, size) || is_stack(addr, size))))
+ (is_stack(addr, size))
extern unsigned long get_fault_addr(void);
diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/tt/uaccess.c b/arch/um/kernel/tt/uaccess.c
--- a/arch/um/kernel/tt/uaccess.c
+++ b/arch/um/kernel/tt/uaccess.c
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
int copy_from_user_tt(void *to, const void __user *from, int n)
{
- if(!access_ok_tt(VERIFY_READ, from, n))
+ if(!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, from, n))
return(n);
return(__do_copy_from_user(to, from, n, ¤t->thread.fault_addr,
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ int copy_from_user_tt(void *to, const vo
int copy_to_user_tt(void __user *to, const void *from, int n)
{
- if(!access_ok_tt(VERIFY_WRITE, to, n))
+ if(!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, to, n))
return(n);
return(__do_copy_to_user(to, from, n, ¤t->thread.fault_addr,
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ int strncpy_from_user_tt(char *dst, cons
{
int n;
- if(!access_ok_tt(VERIFY_READ, src, 1))
+ if(!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, src, 1))
return(-EFAULT);
n = __do_strncpy_from_user(dst, src, count,
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ int __clear_user_tt(void __user *mem, in
int clear_user_tt(void __user *mem, int len)
{
- if(!access_ok_tt(VERIFY_WRITE, mem, len))
+ if(!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, mem, len))
return(len);
return(__do_clear_user(mem, len, ¤t->thread.fault_addr,
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc.
Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course
Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005
Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-25 22:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-25 22:00 [uml-devel] [PATCH 01/11] uml: sigio code - reduce spinlock hold time Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
2005-10-25 22:01 ` Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso [this message]
2005-10-25 22:01 ` [uml-devel] [PATCH 03/11] uml: fix signal code x86-64 [for 2.6.15] Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
2005-10-25 22:01 ` [uml-devel] [PATCH 04/11] uml: fix SKAS0 assembly stubs - use proper constraints Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
2005-10-25 22:01 ` [uml-devel] [PATCH 05/11] uml: fix assembly stub for segv Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
2005-10-25 22:01 ` [uml-devel] [PATCH 06/11] uml: remove bogus WARN_ON, triggerable harmlessly on a page fault race Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
2005-10-25 22:01 ` [uml-devel] [PATCH 07/11] uml: fix mcast network driver error handling Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
2005-10-25 22:02 ` [uml-devel] [PATCH 08/11] uml console channels: remove console_write wrappers Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
2005-10-25 22:02 ` [uml-devel] [PATCH 09/11] uml console channels: fix the API of console_write Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
2005-10-25 22:02 ` [uml-devel] [PATCH 10/11] uml: avoid malloc to sleep in atomic sections Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
2005-10-25 22:03 ` [uml-devel] [PATCH 11/11] uml: micro fixups to arch Kconfig Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051025220107.20010.57705.stgit@zion.home.lan \
--to=blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox