linux-um archives
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso" <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [uml-devel] [PATCH 5/6] i386: use -mcpu, not -mtune, for GCCs older than 3.4
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 00:13:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051025221327.21106.79685.stgit@zion.home.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051025221105.21106.95194.stgit@zion.home.lan>

From: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>

I just noted that -mtune is used, which is only supported on recent GCCs; by
reading http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html, you see "-mcpu has been renamed
to -mtune.", so for GCC < 3.4 we're not using any specific tuning in the
appropriate cases. However -mcpu is deprecated, so use -mtune when possible.

This was introduced by commit e9d4dce954a60dc23dd1d967766ca2347b780e54 of the
old tree (between 2.6.10-rc3 and 2.6.10) by Linus Torvalds, to remove the use of
 -march, since that could trigger gcc using SSE on its own. But no attention was
used about using -mcpu vs. -mtune.

And btw, the old 2.6.4 code (for instance) was:
cflags-$(CONFIG_MPENTIUMII)     += $(call check_gcc,-march=pentium2,-march=i686)
cflags-$(CONFIG_MPENTIUMIII)    += $(call check_gcc,-march=pentium3,-march=i686)
cflags-$(CONFIG_MPENTIUMM)      += $(call check_gcc,-march=pentium3,-march=i686)
cflags-$(CONFIG_MPENTIUM4)      += $(call check_gcc,-march=pentium4,-march=i686)

Signed-off-by: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
---

 arch/i386/Makefile.cpu |   18 +++++++++++++-----
 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/i386/Makefile.cpu b/arch/i386/Makefile.cpu
--- a/arch/i386/Makefile.cpu
+++ b/arch/i386/Makefile.cpu
@@ -1,6 +1,14 @@
 # CPU tuning section - shared with UML.
 # Must change only cflags-y (or [yn]), not CFLAGS! That makes a difference for UML.
 
+#-mtune exists since gcc 3.4, and some -mcpu flavors didn't exist in gcc 2.95.
+HAS_MTUNE	:= $(call cc-option-yn, -mtune=i386)
+ifeq ($(HAS_MTUNE),y)
+tune		= $(call cc-option,-mtune=$(1),)
+else
+tune		= $(call cc-option,-mcpu=$(1),)
+endif
+
 align := $(cc-option-align)
 cflags-$(CONFIG_M386)		+= -march=i386
 cflags-$(CONFIG_M486)		+= -march=i486
@@ -8,17 +16,17 @@ cflags-$(CONFIG_M586)		+= -march=i586
 cflags-$(CONFIG_M586TSC)	+= -march=i586
 cflags-$(CONFIG_M586MMX)	+= $(call cc-option,-march=pentium-mmx,-march=i586)
 cflags-$(CONFIG_M686)		+= -march=i686
-cflags-$(CONFIG_MPENTIUMII)	+= -march=i686 $(call cc-option,-mtune=pentium2)
-cflags-$(CONFIG_MPENTIUMIII)	+= -march=i686 $(call cc-option,-mtune=pentium3)
-cflags-$(CONFIG_MPENTIUMM)	+= -march=i686 $(call cc-option,-mtune=pentium3)
-cflags-$(CONFIG_MPENTIUM4)	+= -march=i686 $(call cc-option,-mtune=pentium4)
+cflags-$(CONFIG_MPENTIUMII)	+= -march=i686 $(call tune,pentium2)
+cflags-$(CONFIG_MPENTIUMIII)	+= -march=i686 $(call tune,pentium3)
+cflags-$(CONFIG_MPENTIUMM)	+= -march=i686 $(call tune,pentium3)
+cflags-$(CONFIG_MPENTIUM4)	+= -march=i686 $(call tune,pentium4)
 cflags-$(CONFIG_MK6)		+= -march=k6
 # Please note, that patches that add -march=athlon-xp and friends are pointless.
 # They make zero difference whatsosever to performance at this time.
 cflags-$(CONFIG_MK7)		+= $(call cc-option,-march=athlon,-march=i686 $(align)-functions=4)
 cflags-$(CONFIG_MK8)		+= $(call cc-option,-march=k8,$(call cc-option,-march=athlon,-march=i686 $(align)-functions=4))
 cflags-$(CONFIG_MCRUSOE)	+= -march=i686 $(align)-functions=0 $(align)-jumps=0 $(align)-loops=0
-cflags-$(CONFIG_MEFFICEON)	+= -march=i686 $(call cc-option,-mtune=pentium3) $(align)-functions=0 $(align)-jumps=0 $(align)-loops=0
+cflags-$(CONFIG_MEFFICEON)	+= -march=i686 $(call tune,pentium3) $(align)-functions=0 $(align)-jumps=0 $(align)-loops=0
 cflags-$(CONFIG_MWINCHIPC6)	+= $(call cc-option,-march=winchip-c6,-march=i586)
 cflags-$(CONFIG_MWINCHIP2)	+= $(call cc-option,-march=winchip2,-march=i586)
 cflags-$(CONFIG_MWINCHIP3D)	+= $(call cc-option,-march=winchip2,-march=i586)



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc.
Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course
Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005
Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-10-25 22:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-10-25 22:11 [uml-devel] [PATCH 1/6] Uml - reuse i386 cpu-specific tuning Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
2005-10-25 22:12 ` [uml-devel] [PATCH 2/6] uml: fix "reuse i386 cpu optimizations" Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
2005-10-25 22:12 ` [uml-devel] [PATCH 3/6] uml: remove old UM_FASTCALL, and make the thing work again Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
2005-10-25 22:12 ` [uml-devel] [PATCH 4/6] x86_64: fix L1_CACHE_SHIFT_MAX for Intel EM64T [for 2.6.14?] Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
2005-10-25 22:24   ` [uml-devel] " Andi Kleen
2005-10-25 22:44     ` Blaisorblade
2005-10-25 23:33       ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-26  0:00         ` Blaisorblade
2005-10-25 22:13 ` Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso [this message]
2005-10-25 22:13 ` [uml-devel] [PATCH 6/6] x86_64: enable xchg optimization for x86_64 Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
2005-10-25 22:22   ` [uml-devel] " Andi Kleen
2005-10-25 22:44     ` Blaisorblade
2005-10-26  7:22 ` [uml-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/6] Uml - reuse i386 cpu-specific tuning Andrew Morton
2005-10-26  9:19   ` Blaisorblade

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051025221327.21106.79685.stgit@zion.home.lan \
    --to=blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox