From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1EZCdz-0000M8-Sx for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 11:27:03 -0800 Received: from smtp005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.11.36]) by mail.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 4.44) id 1EZCdw-0006cj-Bs for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 11:27:03 -0800 From: Blaisorblade Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Does UML 2.6.14 work under x86-64? References: <200511061723.32848.rob@landley.net> In-Reply-To: <200511061723.32848.rob@landley.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511072032.27218.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:32:26 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Rob Landley , David Lang On Monday 07 November 2005 00:23, Rob Landley wrote: > David Lang is trying to get my firmware build working under x86-64, proper x86-64 or a 32-bit binary? > and=20 > when I upgraded him to 2.6.14 (to get around the memory leak in 2.6.13.2), > he > started getting this: > >> Kernel panic - not syncing: get_skas_faultinfo : failed to wait for > >> SIGUSR1/SIGTRAP, pid =3D 16411, n =3D 16411, errno > >> =A0 0, status =3D 0xb7f > > This is 2.6.14 configured like so: > > CONFIG_MODE_SKAS=3Dy > EOF > yes "" | make ARCH=3Dum oldconfig && > make ARCH=3Dum Ok, this seems a 64-bit binary if built on x86-64. > He first tried with the LDT patch applied. When I last tried that patch doesn't compile on x86-64. > Then he tried reverting it (and=20 > adding LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=3D2.4.1 to the kernel command line), but that did= n't > help. > Any clues? (Should I tell him to just try -tt mode? > Or revert to 2.6.13=20 > with the leak fix?) For now, any of these workaround is good, if it works. On the bug: there are some problems with the stub assembly code - it=20 miscompiles on some GCC releases. I'm trying to fix that - and -bs1 may or = may not help on this (for some people it refuses to compile on x86_64). GCC version? --=20 Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!". Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894) http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade =09 ___________________________________=20 Yahoo! Messenger: chiamate gratuite in tutto il mondo=20 http://it.messenger.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel