[uml-devel] Needed arch_copy_tls? Not done by dup_task_struct?

[Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>]

I looked at my patch's comment and noticed that arch_copy_tls, your 
introduction, shouldn't indeed be needed, because dup_task_struct should do 
that (it copies the whole task_struct, and it seems that arch_thread is 
included in that blob rather than pointed too).

I'm fairly puzzled at that. Have you any idea on this?

Also, since you have a good test FS (Fedora), can I send you the updated 
versions I put out / can you test them? My Sarge isn't good any more, likely 
because glibc was updated by apt-get, and it works well with the LDT 
fallback.

I've just uploaded 2.6.15-bs1-tls for people to test.
-- 
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!".
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894)
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade

	

	
		
___________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB 
http://mail.yahoo.it



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel